USPTO serial 77124593
GRAVIPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3838227Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 24, 2010
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GRAVIPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MECHANICAL DEVICES FOR THE CHEMICAL AND FOR THE PLASTICS AND RUBBER PRODUCING, PROCESSING AND TREATING INDUSTRY AS WELL AS FOR THE FOOD INDUSTRY, NAMELY, MACHINES FOR THE PRODUCTION, PROCESSING, FEEDING, BLENDING, GRANULATING, DRYING, CRYSTALLIZING OF PLASTICS AND RUBBER, DOSING AND MIXING MACHINES, MECHANICAL CONVEYORS, RECYCLING MACHINES, NAMELY, GRANULATORS, INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS FOR REMOVAL AND HANDLING, RECYCLING MACHINES, SLIDE GATES AND DISCHARGE UNITS AS PARTS OF MACHINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2008 |
| 009 | ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED DEVICES, NAMELY, DOSING CONTROL SYSTEMS AND DEVICES FOR THE MONITORING AND REGULATING OF MACHINES AND INSTALLATIONS OF THE CHEMICAL AND OF THE PLASTICS AND RUBBER PRODUCING, PROCESSING AND TREATING INDUSTRY AS WELL AS OF THE FOOD INDUSTRY; ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED FEEDING DEVICES WITH GRAVIMETRIC OR VOLUMETRIC MOTOR CONTROL FOR THE CHEMICAL AND FOR THE PLASTICS AND RUBBER PRODUCING, PROCESSING AND TREATING INDUSTRY AS WELL AS FOR THE FOOD INDUSTRY; DOSAGE DISPENSERS, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR DISPENSING PREDETERMINED DOSAGES OF BULK AND SOLIDS, AND DOSIMETERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Colortronic Systems AG
- Other trademarks owned by Colortronic Systems AG
- Other trademarks owned by Colortronic Systems AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GRAVIPLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |