USPTO serial 77125513
VINCENT VAN GOGH PREMIUM ICE CREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VINCENT VAN GOGH PREMIUM ICE CREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nanuet, NY
Nanuet, NY
ASTORLA, NY
Astoria, NY
ASTORIA, NY
ASTORIA, NY
ASTORIA, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen yoghurt; Frozen yogurt; Fruit ices; Gelato; Ice cream; Ice cream drinks; Ice cream mixes; Ice cream powder; Ice cream sandwiches; Ice cream substitute; Ice milk; Ice-cream cakes; Sherbets; Sorbet; Soy-based ice cream substitute; Starch-based binding agents for ice cream; Starch-based thickeners for whipped cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Costello, Rachel S
- Other trademarks owned by Costello, Rachel S
- Other trademarks owned by WELSZ, JORDAN
- Other trademarks owned by VINCENT VAN GOGH CAFE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WEISZ, JORDAN
- Other trademarks owned by WEISZ, JORDAN
- Other trademarks owned by WEISZ, JORDAN
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named VINCENT VAN GOGH PREMIUM ICE CREAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |