USPTO serial 77125656
THE LEADER IN LOSS MITIGATION!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE LEADER IN LOSS MITIGATION!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LUXEMBOURG, LU
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
WEST PALM BEACH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Gryce,
DAVID C. GRYCE, ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business process outsourcing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS S.A.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by Ocwen Financial Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Ocwen Financial Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE LEADER IN LOSS MITIGATION!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |