Drawing for SPRIS

USPTO serial 77125952

SPRIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPRIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Vogel

JASON M. VOGEL KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP31 W 52ND ST FL 14NEW YORK, NY 10019-6118UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009glasses for fields, monocle, glasses for opera, ice glasses, glasses for children, glasses holder, sunglass frames, eyeglass frames, eyeglass cases, eyeglass chains, eyeglass cords, spectacle glasses, sunglass cases, glasses, goggles for sports, polarizing glasses, containers for contact lenses, contact lens cleaning apparatus, contact lenses, pince-nez mountings, pince-nez cases, pince-nez cords, pince-nez, lightproof glasses, diving glasses, goggles for ski, snow goggles, swimming goggles, glasses with a handle, lenses for sunglasses, sunglasses, protective eyepiece, eyeglasses, correcting glasses, eyeshades, anti-glare glasses, dustproof glasses, glasses for reading, monocle frames, eyeglass frames made up with metal or synthetic materials, eyeglasses for theaterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance