USPTO serial 77126326
AERIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AERIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Brunswick, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags and holdalls for sports clothing; Bags for sports; Barrel bags; Beach bags; Belt bags; Book bags; Boston bags; Carry-all bags; Carry-on bags; Charm bags (omamori-ire); Clutch bags; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Duffel bags; Duffel bags for travel; Duffle bags; Flexible bags for garments; Garment bags for travel; Gym bags; Key bags; Kit bags; Messenger bags; Overnight bags; Roll bags; School bags; School book bags; Shaving bags sold empty; Shoe bags for travel; Small bags for men; Souvenir bags; Sports bags; Tote bags; Travel bags; Traveling bags; Travelling bags; Waist bags; Wash bags for carrying toiletries; Wristlet bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Hat bands; Hats; Small hats; Toboggan hats, pants and caps; Woolly hats; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; T-shirts; Athletic shoes; Canvas shoes; Cycling shoes; Running shoes; Shoes; Skiing shoes; Tongue or pullstrap for shoes and boots; Track and field shoes; Training shoes; Volleyball shoes; Women's shoes; Work shoes and boots; Japanese style clogs and sandals; Japanese style sandals (zori); Japanese style sandals of felt; Japanese style sandals of leather; Japanese toe-strap sandals (asaura-zori); Pedicure sandals; Sandal-clogs; Sandals; Camp shirts; Dress shirts; Golf shirts; Headbands against sweating; Knit shirts; Open-necked shirts; Pique shirts; Polo shirts; Shirts; Sport shirts; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Sweat bands; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat shorts; Sweat suits; Swim trunks; Swim wear; Swim wear for gentlemen and ladies; Swimming caps; Swimming trunks; After ski boots; Apres-ski shoes; Ski and snowboard shoes and parts thereof; Ski bibs; Ski boot bags; Ski boots; Ski gloves; Ski jackets; Ski masks; Ski pants; Ski suits; Ski suits for competition; Ski wear; Wet suits for water-skiing and sub-aqua; Surf wear; Skating outfits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |