USPTO serial 77127410
EXPLOTRACK RFID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPLOTRACK RFID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eagleville, PA
HARLEYSVILLE, PA
HARLEYSVILLE, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Zielinski, Esq.
Robert F. Zielinski Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney PCP.O. Box 1404Alexandria, VA 22314-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sensors and tracking equipment, namely, radio frequency identification tags and readers, electrical and electronic detectors, infrared sensors, motion sensors, temperature sensors, electromagnetic tags, acoustomagnetic tags, and magnetically coded microwire for identifying, tacking and tracing explosives; infrared signal transmitters; scanners; video equipment, namely, video recorders, electronic video surveillance installations, video monitors, video processors, video receivers, video transmission apparatus, and closed-circuit television cameras; computer hardware and software for retrieving, monitoring, encrypting and publishing data received from sensors and tracking equipment; electronic devices for locating and tracking explosives programmed to use global positioning systems and cellular communications, namely, computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers, and network interface devices; mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection and management of data; computer hardware, namely, wireless access point devices; global radio packet service devices, namely, GPRS modems, GPRS routers and GPRS telemetry systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Tracking and monitoring of package shipments, namely, explosives | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transportation and distribution, delivery of explosives by land, water and air; transport of explosives by land, water and air; cargo handling services for explosives; packing, crating and warehousing services of explosives for transportation; transportation and storage of explosives; freight forwarding services; explosives cargo loading and unloading; supply chain, logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of explosives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXPLOTRACK, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EXPLOTRACK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXPLOTRACK, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named EXPLOTRACK RFID
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |