USPTO serial 77127436
MEDICAL ENVELOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDICAL ENVELOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Peter Albert, Jr.
G. Peter Albert, Jr. Foley & Lardner LLP11250 El Camino RealSuite 200San Diego, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Receiving and storing emergency health profile information and providing emergency health profile information to authorized emergency services and first responders upon request | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |