USPTO serial 77127453
RESRCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RESRCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate brokerage; Real estate consultancy; Real estate consultation; Real estate agencies | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2009 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |