USPTO serial 77128597
NEW AMSTERDAM LEATHERWORKS NEW YORK CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEW AMSTERDAM LEATHERWORKS NEW YORK CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIK M. PELTON
ERIK M. PELTON ERIK M. PELTON & ASSOCIATES, PLLCPO BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Handbags, travel bags, briefcases, luggage, leather bags, suitcases and wallets, all made in whole or a significant portion of leather | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wang, Chung Chieh
- Other trademarks owned by Wang, Chung Chieh
- Other trademarks owned by Donchez, Ronald E
- Other trademarks owned by Donchez, Ronald E
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named NEW AMSTERDAM LEATHERWORKS NEW YORK CITY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |