USPTO serial 77128616
DOUBLE PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOUBLE PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Las Vegas, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nina Ringel
Nina Ringel THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, LLC5909 SEA OTTER PLCARLSBAD, CA 92010-6630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action skill games; Amusement game machines; Arcade games; Arcade-type electronic education video games; Arcade-type electronic video games; Backgammon game sets; Badminton game playing equipment; Basketball table top games; Billiard game playing equipment; Bingo game playing equipment; Board games; Card games; Coin-operated video games; Dice games; Disposable ticket sets for playing games of chance; Electronic dart games; Electronic educational game machines for children; Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing a memory game; Equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; Floor-standing units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Game equipment, namely, chips; Game tables; Gaming equipment, namely, game wheels; Hand held unit for playing electronic games; Hand held unit for playing video games; Hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; Horizontal pinball machine; Japanese chess; Japanese dice games; Karuta playing cards (Japanese card game); LCD game machines; Manipulative games; Nets for ball games; Paddle ball games; Parlor games; Party games; Pinball-type games; Promotional game cards; Ring games; Role playing games; Stand alone video game machines; Tabletop units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Trading card games; Baby multiple activity toys; Bath toys; Battery operated action toys; Cases for toy structures; Toy vehicles and accessories therefore; Collectible Vehicles; Diecast Collectible Vehicles; Cases for toy vehicles; Children's multiple activity toys; Children's wire construction and art activity toys; Collectable toy figures; Electric action toys; Electronic learning toys; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Fantasy character toys; Infant toys; Mechanical toys; Miniature toy helmets; Modeled toy figurines; Musical toys; Play mats for use with toy vehicles; Plush toys; Pop up toys; Positional toy figures; Remote control toys; Sand toys; Rubber character toys; Squeeze toys; Stacking toys; Stuffed toy animals; Toy action figures; Toy animals and accessories therefor; Toy boxes; Toy building blocks; Toy clocks and watches; Toy construction sets; Toy furniture; Toy masks; Toy model train sets; Toy model cars; Toy stamps; Wind-up toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |