USPTO serial 77129240
BRILLIANT CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROZENIC, AMY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRILLIANT CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PROGRAMS FOR OPERATING ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC MACHINES FOR GAMING, GAMBLING AND AMUSEMENT PURPOSES; ACCOUNTING APPARATUS FOR COIN AND TOKEN OPERATED MACHINES FOR GAMING, GAMBLING AND AMUSEMENT PURPOSES, AND STRUCTURAL AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC GAME MACHINES FEATURING GAMES, SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT OPERABLE WITH CURRENCY OR CURRENCY VALUE EQUIVALENTS; GAMING MACHINES WITH OR WITHOUT VIDEO OUTPUT; BETTING MACHINES; ALL THE FOREGOING MACHINES OPERABLE AS INDIVIDUALLY OPERATED MACHINES OR OPERABLE IN A NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF CASINO SERVICES FEATURING A PROGRESSIVE GAMING MACHINE JACKPOT INVOLVING ONE OR MORE GAMING MACHINES, NAMELY A JACKPOT OR PRIZE WITH A FIXED MINIMUM VALUE WHICH INCREASES UNTIL THE JACKPOT IS WON | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |