CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SPUD BUMPS

USPTO serial 77129505

SPUD BUMPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPUD BUMPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark W. Botkin

Mark W. Botkin BOTKINROSE PLC3210 PEOPLES DRHARRISONBURG, VA 22801-7600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Potato chips; potato-based snack foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 11, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 29, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 27, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 21, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 18, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 30, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance