Drawing for 1800JACKPOT

USPTO serial 77129846

1800JACKPOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1800JACKPOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esq.

MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA, ESQ. WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an online marketplace for the computerized trading of goods and services of others over a global communication information network; providing an online auction for the trading of goods and services of others; automated and computerized trading of goods and services of others provided over a global computer network; providing online information in the fields of employment, recruitment, careers, job listings and resumes; providing online interactive employment counseling and recruitment services; promoting the goods and services of others by means of a preferred customer program featuring rewards, coupons, and rewards updates; providing information and links to the websites of others for membership clubs providing discounts and processing rebates for the goods and services of others; providing information and links to the websites of others featuring associations promoting the interests of consumers; promoting the goods and services of others by providing hypertext links to the web sites of others featuring real estate listings and other real estate informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 20, 2008ISSRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance