USPTO serial 77129950
MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAJOR LEAGUE BOWLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Munck
WILLIAM A. MUNCK MUNCK BUTRUS, P.C.DOCKET CLERKP.O. DRAWER 800889DALLAS, TX 75380Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment, education and information services, namely, bowling competitions and exhibitions rendered live, through broadcast media including television and radio and via a global computer network, webcasts or a commercial on-line service; providing information in the field of sports, bowling, entertainment and related topics and providing pre-recorded informational messages relating thereto; all via a global computer network, webcasts or the internet; physical fitness and bowling training, instruction and consultation; physical fitness centers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 7, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |