USPTO serial 77130147
POM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed nuts; snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts and fruits; Food products and snack products, namely, fruit based, nut based snack bars and health bars containing, in whole or in part, pomegranates and pomegranate fruit byproducts, namely, seeds, nuts, dry fruits and pomegranates flavoring | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food products, namely, trail mixes consisting primarily of candies sweets, candy, candy bars, cereal based snack foods; food products, namely, beverages made of coffee, beverages made of tea, caffeine-free coffee, candies sweets, candy, candy bars, cereal based energy bars not for use as a meal replacement, cereal based snack foods, chewing gum, chocolate bars, chocolate candies, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars, coffee; roasted, powdered, granulated, or in drinks coffee, coffee-based beverage containing milk, espresso, flavored ices, flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts, flavorings for beverages, flavorings of tea, fruit ice, fruit ice bar, fruit ices, fruit sauces excluding cranberry and applesauce, fruit teas, grain-based beverages, grain-based food beverages, granola-based snack bars, green tea, herb tea for food purposes, herbal tea for food purposes, ice cream, ice cream drinks, ice cream mixes, ice cream sandwiches, ice milk bars, iced tea, instant coffee, lollipops, milk chocolate, milk shakes, muffin mixes, muffins, non-medicated lozenges, pancake mixes, pancake syrup, pastries, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages, prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages, processed cereals, processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack for or ingredient for making other foods, ready to eat, cereal derived food bars, salad dressings, salad sauces, snack food chews made primarily from brown rice syrup, snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn, sugarfree chewing gum, sugarfree sweets, sugarless candies, sugarless chewing gum, sugarless sweets, sugar-free chewing gum, tea, tea bags, tea for infusions, tea substitutes, tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring, and toffees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 17, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |