USPTO serial 77131051
IMEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
lee levenson
LEE LEVENSON GREENSPOON MARDER100 W CYPRESS CREEK RD STE 700FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309-2195UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Construction elements made of metal, namely, braces; Door hardware, namely keys and key cylinders; Metal bathroom hardware, namely, pulls; Metal hardware namely, pulleys; Metal hardware, namely springs; Metal hardware, namely, nuts; Metal hardware, namely, washers; Metal staples for construction or industrial use; Small items of metal hardware, namely, high security locks and sheet metal plates primarily for the casino and gaming industry | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |