USPTO serial 77133273
WORK FORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORK FORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Laurenzo
Brian Laurenzo Brick Gentry P.C.6701 Westown Parkway, Suite 100West Des Moines, IA 50266UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | General purpose detergents, soaps, deodorizers, and industrial cleaning solvents all for use with pressure washers | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Metal hose reels, namely, manually operated hose reels and self-retracting hose reels; metal hose clamps, metal hose fittings; metal oil cans sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Compressed air pumps, machine parts, namely, metal air nozzles, air hose adapters, air hose chucks, needles and connectors which are parts of air-operated power tools, needles for pumps for inflating tires, tire inflation nozzles; blow guns, blow gun kits consisting of blow guns, inflators, nozzles for air flow, blow gun tips, blow gun needles and needle tips; pressure washers, pressure washer parts and accessories, namely, pressure washer hoses, wands, hose reels,pressure washer pumps, heads, spray trigger guns, spray lances, spray nozzles, all sold as a unit; machine parts, namely, nozzles, which are parts of pressure washers; pneumatic grease systems, namely, pumps, grease guns, grease gun hoses, grease couplers, grease fittings, grease dispensers, grease injector needles, grease clamps and grease gun accessories; pneumatic oil dispensing systems, namely, pumps, oil control guns, oil gun extensions, oil nozzles, oil tappers, oil swivels, oil gun hoses; air filters for air powered equipment, regulators being parts of machines and lubricators for air powered tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Flow switches, pressure switches and thermostats; measuring devices, namely, fluid measuring containers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal hose reels, namely, manually operated hose reels and self-retracting hose reels | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Plastic compressed air hose nozzles; metal and non-metal pouring spouts, and funnels; non-metal oil cans sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Weems Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named WORK FORCE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |