Drawing for BSW

USPTO serial 77133837

BSW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BSW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Stevan Coursey

R. STEVAN COURSEY COURSEY IP LAW, P.C.PO BOX 29509ATLANTA, GA 30359-0509UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio equipment for vehicles, namely, speakers, speaker enclosures, speaker housings, and amplifiersACTIVEApr 15, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 20, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 29, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 27, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 25, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 21, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 21, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 21, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 21, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance