USPTO serial 77134609
AUDIT READY BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUDIT READY BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Preparation of customized business reports for others in the field of information technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Consultation services in the field of providing access to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, the hosting of voice, data, images, audio, video and information via global computer networks; consulting services in the field of information technology; computer network security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; technical consultation for others regarding the use of proprietary software to optimize routing decisions, identify sources of communications, enhance electronic commerce, improve transaction processing, and enhance data applications and data transfers over communications networks, including global computer networks; computer services, namely, creating, designing and maintaining websites for others on a global computer network; Providing facilities for co-location services for internal, extranet, and global computer network servers for others; evaluating, administering and monitoring internal, extranet, and global computer network servers for others; designing, developing and implementation and administration of a global computer network for others; providing technical assistance to facilitate the distribution of data over the global computer information network; hosting the web-sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer and technical consulting services, namely, consultation regarding network routing, e-commerce, transaction processing and transfers of applications and data over global computer networks; creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks; computer network management, namely, management of network-based firewall services, network-based intrusion detection services, host-based intrusion detection services, premises-based firewall services, and managed file integrity services; computer security services, namely, network-based firewall services, network-based intrusion detection services, host-based intrusion detection services, premises-based firewall services, and managed file integrity services; development, design, implementation, testing, analysis, and consulting services in the field of security, access, authorization and encryption for computers, computer hardware and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Savvis Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Savvis Communications Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AUDIT READY BY DESIGN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |