USPTO serial 77135286
ENERGISER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERGISER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A. SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON, P.A.3433 BROADWAY STREET NESUITE 401 BROADWAY PLACE EASTMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Vending Machines for Candies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |