USPTO serial 77135690
CYMSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYMSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Georgianna Witt
GEORGIANNA WITT HOWREY, LLP1111 LOUISIANA ST FL 25HOUSTON, TX 77002-5248UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Flight simulators for aircraft; Vehicle drive training simulators | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
| 016 | Educational publications, namely, training manuals in the field of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
| 040 | Contract manufacturing in the field of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices; Custom manufacture of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices;; Manufacture of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices; to order and/or specification of others; Manufacturing services for others in the field of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
| 041 | Providing on-line training and education services in the field of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices;; Training in the use and operation of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices;; Training services in the field of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
| 042 | Civil engineering for the design of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices; Design for others in the field of computer networks, software, and engineering for the use, repair, maintenance of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices;; Design for others in the field of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices;; Engineering services, namely, engineering for the use, repair and maintenance of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices;; Technology consultation and research in the field of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices;; Technology consultation in the field of ground, naval surface, air and space training and simulation devices | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CymSTAR, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYMSTAR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |