USPTO serial 77137043
PATANEGRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATANEGRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Cooper
DAVID P. COOPER KOLISCH HARTWELL, P.C.520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204-1324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |