USPTO serial 77137165
UKNOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UKNOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Aker
DAVID AKER DAVID AKER, ATTORNEY AT LAW23 SOUTHERN RDHARTSDALE, NY 10530-2128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use on or with a web site or computer for database and text analysis and searching in the field of visual and technology-based refinement to financial news and information provided to institutions and individuals; computer software for use on or with a web site or computer for database and text analysis and searching which provides visual representations to score financial news and information and to allow users to find similar news articles and information; computer software for use on or with a web site or computer for database and text analysis and searching in the field of visual and technology-based refinement to financial news and information to institutions and individuals delivered via service oriented architecture and application service provider business models | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial consultation in the field of business and market development, project management, knowledge representation and modeling, software development and systems integration for developing customized applications related to financial news for the individual and institutional investor; financial consultation in the field of business and market development, project management, knowledge representation and modeling, software development and systems integration for developing customized applications related to financial news for the individual and institutional investor for companies who have a business relationship with individual investors | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software for use on or with a web site or computer for database and text analysis and searching in the field of visual and technology-based refinement to financial news and information as a service to institutions and businesses who assist retail and institutional investors; licensing of computer software for use on or with a web site or computer for database and text analysis and searching in the field of visual and technology-based refinement to financial news as a service to institutions and businesses who assist retail and institutional investors on a subscription basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Litmus Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Litmus Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named UKNOW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |