USPTO serial 77137545
MINTEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2009
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MINTEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
Bingham Farms, MI
Other trademarks owned by Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
Plymouth, MI
Other trademarks owned by Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
Bingham Farms, MI
Other trademarks owned by Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leon Nigohosian, Jr.
35 Highland AvenueMinerals Technologies Inc. - Legal Dept.Bethlehem, PA 18017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in the iron, steel and non-ferrous metals industries; pyrolytic graphite | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | non-electric cables and wires of common metal, namely, calcium wire and aluminum calcium wire for use in the manufacture of steel | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1993 |
| 007 | refractory application machinery comprising refractory guns, mechanical boom and PLC (programmable logic controller) software for the placement of refractory materials to metallurgical vessels, sold together as a unit | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1993 |
| 009 | Electronic measuring devices and controls, namely, oxygen activity measuring probes and laser profile meters for measuring deformations and linings of high-temperature vessels; and computer software for evaluating measurements of refractory linings in high-temperature vessels and for controlling refractory application machinery during repair of refractory linings all for use in the iron, steel and non-ferrous metals industries | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2004 |
| 019 | refractory materials, namely, monolithic castable and gunning mixes, refractory coatings, shapes and blocks, not of metal | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1993 |
| 037 | installation, repair and maintenance of refractory linings in high-temperature vessels | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1993 |
| 040 | manufacture of refractory linings and laser measuring equipment to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 2000 |
| 042 | technology development and consulting services for the iron, steel and non-ferrous metals industries | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MINTEQ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |