USPTO serial 77137964
PURE DECADENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE DECADENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Commerce Township, MI
Commerce Township, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Mowers
MATTHEW R. MOWERS BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | FOAM RUBBER MATERIALS AND POLYMERIC BEADS FOR USE IN STUFFING PILLOWS AND CUSHIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PILLOWS AND CUSHIONS; MATTRESSES; MATTRESS TOPPERS; MATTRESS CUSHIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | POLYMERS, NAMELY, WOVEN POLYMERIC FIBERS AND NON-WOVEN POLYMERIC FIBERS FOR USE IN STUFFING PILLOWS AND CUSHIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | PILLOW ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CASES, COVERS, SLIPS; MATTRESS PADS; MATTRESS COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named PURE DECADENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |