Drawing for RINSE SMART

USPTO serial 77138971

RINSE SMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RINSE SMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jake D. Feldman

Norm D. St. Landau Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street N.W., Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005medicated mouthwashes and mouth rinsesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Nov 19, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 19, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Oct 19, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 19, 2007OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance