USPTO serial 77141379
PURE BEGINNINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3491139Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURE BEGINNINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
MARINA DEL RAY, CA
MARINA DEL REY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mahsa Hakimi
Mahsa Hakimi Hakimi Law916 Kearny Street, suite 604San Francisco, CA 94133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BABY LOTION; BATH LOTION; BATHING LOTIONS; BEAUTY LOTIONS; BODY LOTION; BODY LOTIONS; FACE AND BODY LOTIONS; FACIAL LOTION; HAND LOTIONS; LOTIONS FOR FACE AND BODY CARE; SKIN LOTION; SKIN LOTIONS; SUN CARE LOTIONS; SUN-BLOCK LOTIONS; BODY CREAM; BODY CREAMS; FACE AND BODY CREAMS; FACIAL CREAM; HAND CREAM; HAND CREAMS; NON-MEDICATED SKIN CREAMS; SKIN CREAM; SKIN CREAMS; HAIR SHAMPOO; SHAMPOOS; SHAMPOOS FOR BABIES; BABY OIL; BABY OILS; BATH OIL; BATH OILS; BODY OIL; BODY OILS; FACIAL CLEANSERS; SKIN CLEANSERS; LIP BALM; LIP BALM; NON-MEDICATED DIAPER RASH OINTMENTS AND LOTIONS; NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE CREAMS, NAMELY, STRETCH MARK CREAM; NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE CREAMS, NAMELY, NIPPLE CREAM; BATH SALTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 19, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cullipher, Andrea
- Other trademarks owned by Cullipher, Andrea
- Other trademarks owned by Cullipher, Andrea
- Other trademarks owned by CULLIPHER, ANDREA
- Other trademarks owned by PURE BEGINNINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PURE BEGINNINGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 26, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |