Drawing for HANDS-ON MOBILE HOMBRE

USPTO serial 77141763

HANDS-ON MOBILE HOMBRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HANDS-ON MOBILE HOMBRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Vogl

PETER D. VOGL JONES DAY222 E 41ST ST FL 2NEW YORK, NY 10017-6727UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile phones, personal digital assistants, and wireless communication devices; Computer hardware and computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures into an interactive delivery for multimedia applications; Computer software for application and database integration; Computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; Computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; Communications servers; Network access server operating softwareACTIVE—
035Providing of advertising space by electronic means and global information networks; providing advertising services for othersACTIVE—
038Communication services, namely, providing telecommunication connections to a global computer network for the purpose of assessing and playing interactive computer games; Providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages concerning news and current events, sports, entertainment, facilitation of networking and socialization, among users of mobile phones, personal digital assistants and wireless communication devicesACTIVE—
042Displaying the web sites and images of others on a computer server; Computer software development for others in the field of entertainment programs for use on mobile phones, personal digital assistants and wireless communication devices via mobile communications networks; Computer software development for others in the field of location services for use on mobile phone users, personal digital assistants and wireless communication devices via a mobile communications networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 12, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 17, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance