USPTO serial 77142692
UBT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UBT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
BARRY L. KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C.900 CHAPEL ST STE 1201NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2889UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Waste cotton, raw cotton, cotton, namely, cotton fibers, cotton netting, cotton waddings for clothes, silk flock, hemp, ramie, namely, raw ramie fiber, raffia fibers, ramie fiber, raw linen flax, sisal fiber, coconut fiber, esparto grass, jute, semi-synthetic fibers for textile use, aramid fibers for textile use, plastic fibers for textile use, synthetic fibers for textile use, wool, glass fiber for textile use | ACTIVE | — |
| 023 | Spun silk, silk yarn, gold colored yarn, metallic fiber yarn, metal yarn, waste cotton yarn, hemp yarn, ramie yarn, rayon yarn, spun cotton, cotton yarn, wool yarn, spun thread and yarn, colored yarn, chenille yarn, worsted yarn, hand knit yarn, namely, knitting yarn; linen yarn, coir yarn, wild silk yarn, spun wool, doupion yarn, embroidery yarn, fancy yarn, sewing yarn, rubber thread for textile use, semi-synthetic fiber yarn for textile use, regenerated fiber yarn for textile use; elastic fiber yarn for textile use, threads of plastic materials for textile use, synthetic fiber yarn for textile use, blended silk yarn, blended bast yarn, blended cotton yarn, blended wool yarn, blended inorganic yarn, blended chemical-fiber yarn, jute yarn, regenerated fibers for textile use | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Silk and cotton mixed fabric, silk-cotton union fabric, silk and wool mixed fabric, silk-wool union fabric, bourette fabric, spun silk fabric, silk fabric, covered rubber-yarn fabrics for textile use, metallic fabric consisting of yarn that contains metal for textile use, raised fabric, wasted cotton fabric, hemp fabric, laminated fabric for textile use; ramie fabric, rayon fabric, cotton fabrics, wool cloth, inorganic fiber mixed fabric, inorganic fiber union cloth, woolen fabric, water-proof fabric, chenille fabric, worsted fabric, flax fabric, esparto fabric, artificial suede fabric, regenerated fiber yarn fabric, jersey fabric, coated fabric, namely, polyurethane-coated fabric for upholstery, vinyl coated fabric for use in upholstery purposes, elastic woven material for use in the manufacture of clothing, elastic fabric for clothing, pile fabric, namely, knitted pile fabric; covered rubber yarn fabric, synthetic fiber fabric, blended silk fabric, blended bast fabric, blended cotton fabric, blended wool fabric, blended chemical fiber fabric, chemical fiber mixed fabric, chemical fiber union cloth, jute fabric, knitted fabric, silk knitted grey fabric, cotton knitted grey fabric, wool knitted grey fabric, chemical fiber knitted grey fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kum'o tex Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Kum'o tex Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named UBT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |