Drawing for WILDERNESS ATHLETE

USPTO serial 77143499

WILDERNESS ATHLETE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILDERNESS ATHLETE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara J. Grahn, Esq.

Barbara J. Grahn, Esq. Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP#3300, 45 South 7th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of physically active outdoor activities, namely, hunting, fishing, backpacking, mountain biking and running, canoeing, kayaking, triathlons and rock climbingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 18, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance