Drawing for PENTHOUSE

USPTO serial 77143954

PENTHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENTHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Sigalow

David L. Sigalow Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.255 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 1401Orlando, FL 32801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, drinking water and beerACTIVE—
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, wine, vodka, tequila, champagne, sparkling wine and bourbon; alcoholic cocktail mixes made of vodka and energy drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 2, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 17, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 19, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 11, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 12, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 30, 2011UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Mar 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 9, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 7, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 7, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance