USPTO serial 77145017
EZEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
none
Victor Lam ETERNAL-USA, INC.22308 HATHAWAY AVENUEHAYWARD, CA 94541UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | grinding machines for food processing, cutting machines for cutting food, dishwashers, electric can openers, electric coffee grinders, electric food blenders for household purposes, electric egg beaters, fodder presses, electric food grinders for domestic use, kitchen machines, namely, electric standing mixers, electric juice extractors, juice extractors, pile-extractors, coffee extracting machines, electric fruit squeezers for household purposes, electric food processors, clothes and floor washing machines, cake-fodder crushing machines, grinding mills, electric food preparation apparatus, namely tumblers for marinating food, motors and pumps for refrigerators and freezers, compressors for refrigerators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |