USPTO serial 77145068
STYLING & PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3411093Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STYLING & PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martha Markusen
Martha Markusen Fryberger, Buchanan, Smith & Frederick, P.A.302 West Superior StreetSuite 700DULUTH, MN 55802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Periodical publication, namely, a trade magazine featuring news and information about automotive parts directed to those in the automotive parts industry, including auto parts manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, retailers, vehicle dealerships, garages, installers, new car and new truck dealers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 9, 2007 |
| 037 | Providing a website featuring news and information about automotive parts directed to those in the automotive parts industry, including auto parts manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, retailers, vehicle dealerships, garages, installers, new car and new truck dealers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 2, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |