USPTO serial 77145928
SEVEN SIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEVEN SIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa A. Vallone
MELISSA A. VALLONE BARNES & THORNBURG LLPPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective eye equipment, namely, goggles, eyeglasses and sunglasses, bicycle helmets | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Bicycles, bicycle accessories, namely, pedals, seats, water bottle holders, bells, mirrors, horns, bicycle forks, bicycle cranks, bicycle handle-bar grips, bicycle handle-bar ends, bicycle tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Backpacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Exercise clothing, namely, hats, socks, shorts, pants, shirts, sweatsuits, jackets, leg warmers, cycling gloves, cycling shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Exercise equipment, namely, training bicycles, stationary bicycles, personal exercise mats; knee pads, elbow pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pride International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SEVEN SIN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |