USPTO serial 77146774
HEALTHY HEMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHY HEMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen S. Simpson
ELLEN S. SIMPSON SIMPSON & SIMPSON, PLLC5555 MAIN STWILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221-5430UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk-style beverages, namely, beverages consisting primarily of water, hemp seeds, disodium phosphate, rice syrup, and sugar; trail mix, namely, snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; protein powder, namely, protein for use as a food additive; nut butter, bread dipping oil, namely, hemp oil for bread dipping; and salad toppings, namely, toppings consisting primarily of hemp seeds; nutrition bars, namely, protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bread, tortillas, bagels, brownies, dry breakfast cereals, processed dry cereals, breakfast bars, namely, processed cereal bars, ice cream, waffles, pancakes, salad dressings, croutons, cookies, crackers, pretzels, wraps, namely, hemp flour based flat bread, and hemp chips, namely, chips made from hemp flour | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rich Products Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Rich Products Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named HEALTHY HEMP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |