USPTO serial 77147067
KYOTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KYOTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Miami Shores, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry Oliver Chase
21 SE 1ST AVE STE 700MIAMI, FL 33131-1025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Serving platters; Serving platters not of precious metal; Ceramic sculptures, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; Dinnerware, namely, platters, plates, bowls, servers, pourers, vases, dishes, samplers and spoons; Dishes and plates; Cake servers; Coffee servers; Pie servers; Butter dishes; Dishes; Potpourri dishes; Serving dishes; Flower vases; Flower vases and bowls; Vases; Bowls; Finger bowls; Flower bowls; Fruit bowls; Japanese rice bowls (chawan); Japanese rice bowls not of precious metal (chawan); Japanese style soup serving bowls (wan); Pepper pots, sugar bowls and salt shakers; Salad bowls; Salad bowls; Serving bowls (hachi); Shallow bowls; Sugar bowls; Serving spoons; Spoon rests | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |