USPTO serial 77148768
GRILL TRENDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRILL TRENDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. Jay Hines
P. J. Hines Cantor Colburn LLP1800 Diagonal RoadSuite 510Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Section 44e) Grill cleaning products, namely, all-purpose stainless steel cleaners, (Based on Intent to Use) degreasing preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | (Based on Intent to Use) Charcoal chimney starters in the nature of metal cylinders | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | (Based on Intent to Use) Grill utensils, namely, chef knives | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Miscellaneous grill accessories, namely, meat thermometers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | (Based on Section 44e) Barbecue grill parts and accessories, namely, hoses and adaptors, rock grates, heat plates, replacement burners, fitted grill covers, ceramic briquettes and grill blocks; barbecue grill parts and accessories, namely, replacement cooking grids, miscellaneous replacements parts for gas grills, namely, control knobs, lid handles and universal ignitor kits comprised of push button or electronic ignitor modules with connecting ignitor wires and spark generating electrodes, replacement gas regulators for gas grills, heat radiants for gas grills, namely, ceramic briquettes and heat tents; (Based on Intent to Use) miscellaneous replacements parts for gas grills, namely, heat indicators, heat radiants for gas grills, namely, lava rock; grill topper accessories, namely, perforated grill toppers in the nature of warming trays and un-perforated grill toppers in the nature of cooking trays; chicken roasters in the nature of upright roasting stand; butane grill lighters; electric charcoal starters and electric probes specially designed to ignite charcoal briquettes; miscellaneous grill accessories, namely, hand-held grill lights and mounted grill lights used to illuminate the cooking surface, rotisserie kits comprised of spit rods, meat forks, motors, mounting brackets and counter balance weights, and smoker boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | (Based on Section 44e) Barbecue grill parts and accessories, namely, empty plastic spray bottles; oil sprayers in the nature of empty spray bottles; (Based on Intent to Use) grill utensils, namely, spatulas, tongs, forks, meat hooks, basting brushes, grill cleaning brushes, and cooking skewers; grill cleaning products, namely, scrapers and brushes; grill topper accessories, namely, cooking skewer sets, solid and un-perforated grill toppers in the nature of wood cooking planks and solid steel griddles for use in grilling, grill woks, wire grill baskets for cooking; miscellaneous grill accessories, namely, basting sets comprised of bowls, food basters and brushes for basting meat | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Innovations Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Phoenix Innovations Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named GRILL TRENDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |