Drawing for INTELLIPATH

USPTO serial 77148850

INTELLIPATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIPATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Megan K. Bowen

Megan K. Bowen Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWAttn.:TMSUWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer and telecommunications network consulting services; infrastructure consulting services; computer and telecommunications network design; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems and monitoring of network systems, including telecommunication systems; customer support services, namely, troubleshooting of problems in connection with computer hardware, computer software, computer networking equipment and servicesACTIVEApr 4, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 30, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 29, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Apr 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance