USPTO serial 77149119
CHISUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3773674Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2010
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHISUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wayne, NJ
Wayne, NJ
Research Triangle Park, NC
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith E. Danish
KEITH E. DANISH Hiscock & Barclay, LLP1270 Avenue of the AmericasSuite 600NEW YORK, NY 10020Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbicides | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 22, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cheminova, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cheminova, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CHEMINOVA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FMC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CHISUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |