Drawing for OPTIMIZED CONTACT SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 77149255

OPTIMIZED CONTACT SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIMIZED CONTACT SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradford R. Norton

325 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 200Las Vegas, NV 89119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Direct mail marketing and consulting servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 6, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 6, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 21, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 31, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Oct 31, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Oct 31, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Sep 12, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 30, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 7, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 7, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 11, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 16, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 11, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance