USPTO serial 77149362
ACCESS+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3928801Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2011
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACCESS+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ST. MICHAEL, BB
ST. MICHAEL, BB
ST. MICHAEL, BB
ST. MICHAEL, BB
MISSISSAUGA, CA
Oakville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua Jarvis, Esq.
Joshua Jarvis, Esq. Foley Hoag LLP155 Seaport BoulevardBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Detectable warning and wayfinding products for the visually impaired, namely, cast in place and surface applied textured non-metal tiles having a plurality of projections detectable by the visually impaired under foot or by cane-on-contact, modular pavers having a textured surface have a plurality of projections detectable by the visually impaired under foot or by cane-on-contact, directional non-metal tiles and guidance non-metal tiles for the visually impaired | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 10, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ENGINEERED SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENGINEERED SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENGINEERED SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENGINEERED SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTRA CAPITAL INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Astra Capital Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named ACCESS+
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 8, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |