Drawing for CLEANUP

USPTO serial 77149380

CLEANUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEANUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.SUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Built-in kitchen, namely, electromagnetic induction cookers, kitchen sinks, gas stoves, electric stoves; kitchen sinks; kitchen gas stoves; kitchen electric stoves, induction ovens; sinks; household tap-water filters; range hoods and extractor hoods, for household purposes; electromagnetic induction cookers for household purposes; non-electric cooking heaters for household purposes electric cooking ovens for household purposes; microwave ovens cooking apparatus; electric cooking stoves for household purposes; gas water heaters for household use; hot plates for household purposes; electric foot warmers for personal use; electric kettles for household purposes; electric coffee makers for household purposes; electric cooking pots for household purposes; electric bath-water purifying apparatus for household purposes; air purifiers for household purposes; dehumidifiers for household purposes; water ionizers for household purposes; feed water heaters for industrial purposes; air-conditioning apparatus for industrial purposes; lighting fixtures; electric refrigerator for household purposes; electric freezers for household purposes; gas refrigerators; ice-cooling refrigerators for household purposes; ice machines; drying apparatus for chemical processing; prefabricated bathrooms, namely, bathtub, shower cubicles; bathtubs; bathtub units integral with a bathroom floor; whirlpool baths; showers; bathtub units integral with a bathroom floor and a sink; bath boilers; industrial cooking ovens; electromagnetic equipment for industrial purposes, namely, electromagnetic induction cookers for industrial purposes; industrial dish drying machines; dish disinfectant apparatus for industrial purposesACTIVE—
020Water tanks for household purposes not of metal or masonry; furniture; washing stands; built-in kitchen, namely, kitchen cupboards, kitchen cabinets, kitchen islands; cupboards with built-in dish drying machines; hanging cupboards; hanging cupboards with built-in cupboards; storage racks; mirrors looking glasses not for carrying with; receiver-side storage boxes for home delivery services; lockers; furniture hardware, namely, furniture handgrips and furniture pull-taps of plastic or wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials; industrial packaging containers of plastics; metallic kitchen worktops; kitchen worktopsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 18, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance