USPTO serial 77149499
CWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael T. Evangelisti
MICHAEL T. EVANGELISTI FARRIS MATHEWS BRANAN BOBANGO HELLEN & DUNLAP PLC1100 RIDGEWAY LOOP RD STE 400MEMPHIS, TN 38120-4058UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Automobile cleaners; Automobile polish; Automobile polishes; Automobile wax; Automotive cleaning preparations; Carpet cleaners; Carpet cleaners with deodorizer; Carpet cleaning preparations; Carpet shampoo; Cleaner for use on automobiles; Cleaning preparations for automobiles; Detergents for automobiles; Fragrances for automobiles; Glass cleaners; Glass cleaning preparations; Polishing powders; Polishing preparations; Preparations for cleaning, protecting and preserving vehicle surfaces; Tire dressings; Treatment preparations for use on vehicle wheels and wheel covers; Upholstery cleaners; Wax stripping preparations; Whitewall cleaners; Windshield cleaner fluids | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2006 |
| 007 | Electrical water pumps for car wash sprayers; Hoses for vacuum cleaners; Machine parts, namely nozzles which are parts of power-operated sprayers; Machines for cleaning surfaces using high pressure water; Power-operated spray guns; Power-operated sprayers; Pressure washing machines; Pump control valves; Regulators being parts of machines; Suction nozzles for vacuum cleaners; Vacuum cleaner hoses; Vacuum cleaners; Valves for pumps; Vehicle washing installations; Vehicle washing machines; Water pumps for car wash sprayers; Air compressors | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |