Drawing for MPH

USPTO serial 77149813

MPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Kenney

ROBERT J. KENNEY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MPEG audio layer-3 MP3 players; compact disc players; dry cell batteries; audio speakers; telephone sets; acoustic diaphragms for microphone and speakers; headphones; facsimile machines; sound recording strips; resistance measuring devices; electric outlets; chargers for electric batteries; transistors; radio tuners; digital versatile disc (DVD) players; recorded audiotapes of music; sound reproduction apparatus; amplifiers; loud speaking apparatus and instruments; Recorded videotapes of music; video tape recorders; jukeboxes for music; audio cassette players; television sets; video cameras for broadcasting; sound recording apparatus and instruments; amusement apparatus adapted for use with television receivers only; portable communication apparatus, namely, radios, handsets, walki-talkies, satellite telephones, land line telephones, digital cellular phones; video disc players; audio and video receivers; woofers; head cleaning tapes for audio and video recorders; personal digital assistants (PDA); portable multimedia players (PMP); digital multimedia broadcasting (DMB) receivers; blank CD-ROMs for sound or video recording; light emitting diodes; liquid crystal display (LCD) panelsACTIVE—
038Communications by fiber optic networks; data communication, namely, electronic transmission of data among users or computers; wireless communication, namely, wireless broadband communication services and wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images and information; value added network communication, namely, telephone telecommunication services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; remote screen communication, namely, providing facilities and equipment for video conferencing; rental of telecommunication equipment; communication by computer terminals; cellular telephone communication; cable television broadcasting; providing information about telecommunication; computer aided transmission of messages and images; Providing multiple-user access to a global computer network; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users in the field of general interest; education television and radio broadcasting; radio broadcasting; cable television broadcasting; Internet broadcasting; television broadcastingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 24, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 24, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 18, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 8, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 2, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 1, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 1, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance