USPTO serial 77150065
HATTRICK SOFTWARE LIMITED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HATTRICK SOFTWARE LIMITED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael M. Ballard
MICHAEL M. BALLARD WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and images; blank magnetic data carriers; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring software for monitoring, managing and analyzing business and financial transactions; data processing equipment, namely, servers, data processors, central processing units for processing information and data; computer software for monitoring, managing and analyzing business and financial transactions; computer software for comparing analyzed business and financial transactions against expected values; computer software for error detection and the correction of errors in business and financial transactions; computer software for the automated processing of business and financial transactions; computer software for monitoring and analyzing business and financial transactions, patterns, events and processes; computer software for comparing executing and executed events against a description of expected events; computer software which manages the comparison of executing and executed events against expected events and original information and which provides alerts in response to events; computer software that provides alerts in response to processing exceptions and outages; computer software that automates the escalation of alerts; computer software for the monitoring and managing of computer software, computer hardware and business and financial transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |