Drawing for CHLOE & JANE

USPTO serial 77150459

CHLOE & JANE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHLOE & JANE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yano L. Rubinstein

Yano L. Rubinstein Hinshaw & Culbertson LLPOne California St., 18th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003(Based on Use in Commerce) Facial cleansers; Skin cleansers; Face and body lotions; Face and body creams; Body scrub; Body washes; Facial washes; Body butter; Skin conditioners; (Based on Intent to Use) Facial scrubs; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated sun care preparations; After sun-creams; After-sun lotions; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetics; Make-up foundations; Lip balm; Lipsticks; Lip gloss; Skin moisturizer; Make-up remover; Bath gels; Liquid soaps; Bath beads; Bath crystals; Bath oils; Bath salts; Sun block preparations; Sun care lotions; Sun creams; Sun screen preparations; Sun tan gel; Sun tan lotion; Sun tan oil; Hair shampoo; Hair conditioners; Massage oils; Lotions for massage; Liquid soap used in foot bath; Non-medicated foot cream; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely shampoo and conditioner; Non-medicated skin care preparationsACTIVEMar 5, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 3, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance