USPTO serial 77150470
LIBELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIBELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S. LONDA NORRIS, MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, P.A.875 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer database and application software recorded on digital media for application and database integration in the areas of data backup, data recovery and data restoration; computer software for application and database integration and protection; computer operating programs and systems; computer software for use in database management, protection and rescue; computer software development tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Producing computer software for others for the development in the area of data backup, data recovery and data restoration, namely, computer software development; developing, designing and implementing networks and network-referred computer programs for others in the field of data backup, data recovery and data restoration; computer services, namely developing, producing and maintaining computer programs and program analysis, namely, computer software design for others; computer services, namely design of database organization in the nature of database development services; computer software development with the aid of data and development tools; design and development of databases with use of standard databases; computer software solutions consultation, namely, technology advice provided to Internet users by means of a technical support hotline | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |