CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EXTENSIA

USPTO serial 77150881

EXTENSIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, ERIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTENSIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly A. Wingate

Kimberly A. Wingate Lathrop & Gage LLP2345 Grand Blvd.Suite 2800Kansas City, MO 64108-2612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, moisturizers, rinses, mists, thermal protective sprays, spray conditioners, hair gels, spray gels, sculpting foam, lotions, styling serum, styling sprays, styling gels, styling lotions, straightening creams, hair sprays, pomades, styling preparations, shine sprays, shine drops, hair waxes, and non medicated treatments, namely, hair strengthening preparations, and hair straightening preparationsACTIVE—
026Wigs, hair pieces, hair extensions, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hairACTIVE—
044Hair replacement, hair addition, and hair extension servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 10, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance