USPTO serial 77153247
LET'S TALK TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LET'S TALK TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmers' Mutual Telephone Company
Nora Springs, IA
Farmers' Mutual Telephone Company
Nora Springs, IA
Farmers' Mutual Telephone Company
Nora Springs, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent A. Herink
KENT A. HERINK DAVIS, BROWN, KOEHN, SHORS & ROBERTS, P.C.215 10th Street, Suite 1300The Davis Brown TowerDES MOINES, IA 50309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Wireless broadband communication services; Wireless digital messaging services; Wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images and informations; Wireless telephone telecommunications services, namely, wireless mobile telephone calling plans; Wireless voice mail services; Audio teleconferencing; Video teleconferencing; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; Data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means; Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; Providing access to telecommunication networks; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Providing third party users with access to telecommunication infrastructure; Rental of equipment for telecommunications; Rental of telecommunication equipment; Rental of telecommunication equipment including telephones and facsimile apparatus; Telecommunication access services; Telecommunications by e-mail; Telecommunications gateway services; Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; Internet telephony services; Providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the Internet; Providing remote Internet access; Providing voice communication services via the Internet; Voice over internet protocol (VOIP) services; Cable television broadcasting; Cable television transmission; Electronic transmission of voice, data and images by television and video broadcasting; Television broadcasting; Television transmission services; Cellular telephone services | ACTIVE | Sep 28, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Farmers' Mutual Telephone Company
- Other trademarks owned by Farmers' Mutual Telephone Company
- Other trademarks owned by Farmers' Mutual Telephone Company
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named LET'S TALK TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 28, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 28, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |