Drawing for COASTAL COLOURS BY CHARLES RIVER APPAREL

USPTO serial 77153772

COASTAL COLOURS BY CHARLES RIVER APPAREL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COASTAL COLOURS BY CHARLES RIVER APPAREL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence S. Delaney

Lawrence S. Delaney Demeo & Associates, P.C.One Lewis WharfBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Preparing promotional and merchandising items for othersACTIVEMar 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 20, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 20, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 19, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 11, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Feb 11, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 11, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 15, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 10, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 18, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Aug 18, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 18, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 19, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 19, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 20, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 29, 2007CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
May 29, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
May 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Apr 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance